| Cyclic voltammetry (CV) is one of the most frequently
used electrochemical methods because of its relative simplicity and
its high information content. For example, a cyclic voltammetric (I-E)
curve for the oxidation of ferrocyanide (5mM) to ferricyanide in the
supporting electrolyte solution of KCl (1 M) at a freshly polished
glassy carbon electrode (1.5 mm dia.) is shown in Figure 1. The
waveform of the voltage applied to the working electrode versus the
reference electrode is triangular shaped. Since this voltage varies
linearly with time, the slope is referred to as the scan rate (V/s).
On the reverse scan, the ferricyanide, formed during the forward scan,
is reduced back to ferrocyanide. The peak shape of the oxidative and
reverse current-potential (I-E) curve in Figure 1 is typical for an
electrode reaction in which the rate is governed by diffusion to a planar
electrode surface. That is, the rate of the electron transfer step is
relatively fast compared to that of diffusion. In such a case the peak
current, Ip, is governed by the Randle-Sevcik relationship:
Ip
= k n3/2 A D1/2 C V1/2 Where the constant, k, has a value of 2.72 x
105; n is the mole of electrons transferred per mole of electroactive
species; A is the area of the electrode in cm2; D is the
diffusion coefficient in cm2/s; C is concentration in mole/L;
and V is the scan rate of the potential in volt/s. The Ip
is linearly proportional to the bulk concentration, C, of the electroactive
species and the square root of the scan rate, V1/2. Thus,
an important diagnostic is a plot of the Ip vs V1/2.
If the plot is linear, it is reasonably safe to say that the electrode
reaction is controlled by diffusion, which is the mass transport of
electroactive species to the surface of the electrode across a concentration
gradient. The thickness, d, of the "diffusion" layer can be
approximated by: d ~ [Dt]1/2 , where D is the diffusion coefficient
and t is time in seconds. A "quiet" i.e. unstirred solution
is required. The presence of supporting electrolyte, such as the KCl
in the example, is required to eliminate movement of the charged electroactive
species due to migration in the electric field gradient.
Another important diagnostic to characterize the electrode reaction
is the value of the peak potential, Ep. When the rate of
electron transfer is fast, the Ep value will be independent
of the scan rate and thus the value of Ip. Such a reaction
is said to be "reversible." For a reversible reaction, the
difference between the anodic and cathodic Ep values is equal
to 57 mV/n. This value will be independent of the scan rate. There is
a caveat to the diagnostics for reversibility when there is a notable
solution resistance (ohmic) between the working and reference electrode.
The measured potential then contains an additional component of potential
equal to E (ohmic) = iR. Some instruments have the ability to compensate
for this "error" voltage (referred to as iR compensation).
Cypress Systems also provides a gel-filled hook-shaped reference electrode
whereby the tip of the reference can be placed close to the surface
of the working electrode to minimize iR. 
Experimental Conditions for Figure 1 :
|
Working Electrode:
|
freshly polished 1.5 mm glassy carbon electrode
|
|
Polishing procedure:
|
(see directions under "polishing")
|
|
Solution:
|
5 mM ferrocyanide in aqueous 1 M KCL
|
|
Scan rate:
|
200 mV/s
|
|
Potential range:
|
-200 mV to +600 mV and back to -200 mV
|
Irreversibility is when the rate of electron transfer is sufficiently
slow so that the potential no longer reflects the equilibrium activity
of the redox couple at the electrode surface. In such a case, the Ep
values will change as a function of the scan rate. The 66-CS1200
has algorithms to evaluate the Ip and Ep values, calculate
the area under the I-E curves (the integrated charge), and to calculate
an estimated rate constant. A unique feature of an electrochemical reaction
is that a "reversible" electrode reaction at low scan rates
can become "irreversible" at higher scan rates.
Figure 2 illustrates the CV for an electroactive species (ferrocene)
run at a glassy carbon microelectrode of 10 um diameter. Not
only is the magnitude of the current much less than what is shown in
Figure 1 due to the smaller electrode area, the current goes to a steady-state
maximum and is not peak-shaped. This steady-state current is explained
by envisioning that the microelectrode is a "dot" with the
diffusion layer being hemispherical in shape extending out into the
solution. The amount of ferrocene diffusing to the electrode surface
is defined by the volume enclosed by an expanding hemisphere, not a
plane projecting into the solution as in the case of a planar electrode.
One salient feature of the microelectrode is the small current magnitude,
which means that iR loss is negligible even at high scan rates. This
allows the determination of kinetic rates of electron transfer that
are very fast by going to high scan rates. Of course, one of the salient
feature of microelectrodes is their use for in-vivo studies of neurotransmitters,
as described by Wightman. The ideal instrument for such studies is the
Cypress 66-EI400 Bipotentiostat, which was developed by Robert
Ensman together with Wightman. 
Experimental Procedure for Figure 2:
|
Working Electrode:
|
10 µm diameter platinum
|
|
Reference Electrode:
|
Gel filled or the Premium "no-leak" reference
|
|
Polishing procedure:
|
(see directions under "polishing")
|
|
Solution:
|
3 mm ferrocene and 0.1 M NaClO4 in
acetonitrile
|
|
Scan rate:
|
100 mV/sec Scan range: 0.0 mV to +500 mV and
back to 0.0 mV
|
Finally, CV is great for elucidating the mechanism of electrode reactions
that are complicated by chemical (c) reactions that either precede or
follow the electron (e) transfer step. There are many possible reactions
mechanisms: ee, ec, ce, ece, etc. that are important to consider when
you experimentally encounter multiple peaks or strange-looking CV waves.
Fortunately, there are diagnostic criteria to help sort out possible
mechanisms and perhaps to eliminate some. Nicholson and Shain described
the first comprehensive set of diagnostics in the classical work in
the mid-60's. Today, there are many excellent monographs that serve
as references to learn about CV. Some of these are listed below.
References
R. S. Nicholson and I. Shain, Anal. Chem., 37, 722 (1965).
Ralph N. Adams, Electrochemistry at Solid Electrodes, Dekker (1969).
[A classic for those who want to learn electrochemistry with a practical
bent.]
Joseph Wang, Analytical Electrochemistry, VCH Publishers (1994).
Donald T. Sawyer, Andrzej Sobkowiak and Julian L. Roberts, Jr., Electrochemistry
for Chemists, 2nd edition, Interscience Publishes (1995).
Christopher M. A. Brett and Ana Maria Oliveria Brett, Electrochemistry:
Principles, Methods and Applications, Oxford Science Publications (1993).
Larry R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Characterization of Chemical Systems,
pages 137-248 in Physical Methods of Modern Chemical Analysis, Edited
by T. Kuwana, Academic Press, Vol. 3 (1983).
David K. Gosser, Jr., Cyclic Voltammetry: Simulation and Analysis of
Reaction Mechanisms, VCH Publishers (1993). Allen J. Bard and Larry R. Faulkner, Electrochemical
Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, Second Edition, John Wiley and
Sons Publishers (2001).
|